You are currently browsing the archives for the Brad's rants category.
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « Nov | ||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||
| 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 |
| 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 |
| 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | |||
- Brad's rants (2)
- Digital Art-ifacts (25)
- Events (13)
- General (8)
- HP Z3100 (3)
- Ladysmith Camera Club (13)
- News (16)
- Photography (5)
- Photoshop (1)
- Pottery (3)
- Printing (3)
- The Pottery Class (2)
- Uncategorized (6)
- Weather (1)
- Web design (1)
- Windows 7 (3)
- November 26, 2011: December 2011 Hours
- September 7, 2011: September 2011 at the Ladysmith Camera Club
- August 21, 2011: August 2011 at the Ladysmith Camera Club
- March 29, 2011: A great way to learn Dreamweaver CS5
- March 27, 2011: How my Canon 20D became a 53 megapixel super camera!
- March 15, 2011: Preparing images for printing, part 3: The Facebook illusion
- March 7, 2011: Preparing images for printing, part 2: How best to sharpen for the print
- March 6, 2011: Preparing images for printing, part 1: How many pixels do you need?
- March 6, 2011: Stop the "App" Insanity!
- September 21, 2010: Can TV break the cable stranglehold?
Art Reproduction
Blogroll
Digital Art-ifacts
Favourites
Photography
Photoshop
Archive for the Brad's rants Category
Stop the “App” Insanity!
March 6, 2011 by Brad.
“Apps” have become the modern “great differentiator” between devices. ‘MY app store has more apps than their app store, so buy MY smartphone. It’s obviously better than theirs.’ Well, that’s the implication anyway. Marketeers love this; it’s Marketing 101–they teach it in school. Find and flog the key differentiator(s) between your product and their product. If you can’t find one, then invent one.
But “apps” (as ‘defined’ by Apple and now Google, Nokia; and I’ve even read that Microsoft is considering the idea for Windows “8″) are bad, VERY bad. They’re bad for consumers; they’re bad for developers and they’re bad for the computing industry in general. They’re only good for Apple (and possibly Google, Nokia, et al.), but not indefinitely.
Posted in Brad's rants, Digital Art-ifacts | Print | No Comments »
Can TV break the cable stranglehold?
September 21, 2010 by Brad.
Given the wide deployment of broadband Internet access and the advanced state of streaming video technology, something I don’t understand is why are TV channels only available through a cable or satellite TV operator? Just about every AM and FM radio station features a “Listen Live” link on their web site home page. Why is there not a corresponding ”Watch Live” link on the home page of every TV station’s web site?
Radio stations must see many benefits to feeding their signal through an Internet connection. For starters, a web page is interactive–while folks are listening to the stream, they can also read and click on ads, which is an additional revenue source for the broadcaster.
Sponsors must love this too, since their ads can appear on a different rotation through the web page than on-air.
With streaming over the Internet, listeners can tune-in to their favourite stations from back home, even while on vacation or business trips. Wouldn’t the same apply to favourite TV channels from home?
So I don’t get it. Why don’t TV stations support this? How can the cable and satellite TV operators have this stranglehold over the feed?
For further insight into the cable stanglehold, read this.
Posted in Brad's rants, General | Print | No Comments »